Response to Thornton ’ s response to my critique of Reading History Sideways
نویسنده
چکیده
At the November 2005 meeting of the Social Science History Association (SSHA), I participated in a panel discussion on Arland Thornton’s new book, Reading History Sideways: the Fallacy and Enduring Impact of the Developmental Paradigm on Family Life (Chicago, 2005). In January 2006, Thornton posted a lengthy response to my comments on his website, along with five other working papers that address parts of my critique. The present note is my response to Thornton’s response, and attempts to clarify my critique of Thornton’s argument. I do not summarize that argument; my discussion assumes that readers are familiar with it.
منابع مشابه
Descriptions of the Reading History Sideways Method (the Comparative Method) by Scholars of the 1700s, 1800s, and 1900s
متن کامل
John Millar and Other Scholars of the 1700s and 1800s Using the Developmental Paradigm, Reading History Sideways, and International Cross-Sectional Data to Reach Conclusions about Changes in Family Relationships and Processes
متن کامل
Review of Reviews/ ‘Tis Truth not Imagination: A Response to "Sometimes a Desire for Truth, Sometimes Imagination: A Critique on the Book Kimia, The Child of Mowlana’s Household": Gholamreza Khaki
متن کامل
Effectiveness of Targeted Reading Intervention Based on Response to Intervention on Reading Function and Academic Self-efficacy of Third Grade Elementary School Students with Dyslexia
Aims: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of purposeful reading intervention based on response to the intervention on the academic attitudes of dyslexic students in Hamadan. Instrument & Methods: This research was a quasi-experimental study by pre-test, post-test design with control group. The study population included of third grade elementary school students with dyslexi...
متن کامل